(Created page with "==Vandalism== Please do not remove content from RuneScape Classic Wiki pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Template:Sandbox|sa...")
Tag: sourceedit
 
Tag: rte-source
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Vandalism==
 
==Vandalism==
 
Please do not remove content from RuneScape Classic Wiki pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Template:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you. {{Signatures/5-x}} 10:52, January 17, 2016 (UTC)
 
Please do not remove content from RuneScape Classic Wiki pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Template:Sandbox|sandbox]]. Thank you. {{Signatures/5-x}} 10:52, January 17, 2016 (UTC)
  +
:What "vandalism" are you specifically referring to? Without reference, I'll just have to guess.
  +
  +
:If you're referring to the [[fountain]] page, than it is you who is removing worthwhile content. Review the edits. As I've said in all those reverts to your edits, the picture you added is A.) Unnecessary, considering there is already a fountain graphic on that small page, and B.) Taken from a terrible camera angle.
  +
  +
:As for your revert to my edit on [http://runescapeclassic.wikia.com/wiki/Manual:Herblaw?diff=prev&oldid=65499 Manual:Herblaw], my edit was to revert a previous edit which diverted it from the verbatim text. 1.) The original source really did spell it "ingrediants", which is why the <nowiki>{{sic}}</nowiki> tags are there. View the source document for yourself. [https://web.archive.org/web/20021016032133/http://www.jagex.com/manual/herblaw.html link] 2.) The tables are unnecessarily large and my edit does not change their presentation one bit. My edit decreased their page size, which increases loading speed. 3.) [http://runescapeclassic.wikia.com/wiki/Manual:Herblaw?diff=prev&oldid=64947 207.255.218.229] changed the text from its verbatim text to the proper spelling. I corrected his/her mistake, and you reverted my edit. So, you vandalized the wiki. 4.) It obviously wasn't clear enough that this page was taken directly from Jagex rather than being the wiki's comprehensive guide. You did a disservice by removing [http://runescapeclassic.wikia.com/wiki/Manual:Herblaw?diff=next&oldid=65403 my header notification]. Other such notifications should be made on every article from the original Jagex Manual. 5.) You did it again by removing [http://runescapeclassic.wikia.com/wiki/Manual:Herblaw?oldid=65399 this picture] link from the verbatim page. It may not yet be on the wiki, so you should have put it in no-wiki tags. By removing it, you diverted from the verbatim article again. 6.) I don't even know where that edit near the bottom to <nowiki>|daggers]]</nowiki> came from, considering all I did was hit Undo to [http://runescapeclassic.wikia.com/wiki/Manual:Herblaw?oldid=64947 his edit]. If you check the source on all previous edits to that page, you'll see I made no change to it, so IDK why [http://runescapeclassic.wikia.com/wiki/Manual:Herblaw?diff=next&oldid=65401 the wiki says] it was adjusted. I talked with IP83 last February about it on the RS3 wiki and I believe it has something to do with logged out users using the source editor. Some of those random changes don't even show up in Show Changes before an edit is made. When I revert [http://runescapeclassic.wikia.com/wiki/Manual:Herblaw?diff=prev&oldid=65499 your edit], in which you incorrectly stated that the article is now a verbatim copy, the only part I won't revert is <nowiki>|dagger]]s</nowiki> near the bottom.
  +
  +
:Or maybe you're referring to me removing the unnecessary [http://runescapeclassic.wikia.com/wiki/Demon_Slayer?diff=prev&oldid=65167 FeaturedArticleNotice]. It was over 5 years ago and that article has been adjusted significantly during that time. The notice is completely irrelevant to how the article is currently presented. And the notice itself is unnecessary anyway. It provides nothing to the actual content or the reader. If you want a list of featured articles, add it to [[:Category:Featured articles]].
  +
  +
:I could point to you with Assume Good Faith and Don't Be A Dick, but you already know them. You're no different on this wiki than you are on the RS3 one. You're not a team player. You talk down to other editors rather than talking with them. You think your edits are superior to others just because they made them. You are prejudice to those who choose not to register accounts. You target people rather than focusing on edits to the content. For this, you could use a good kick in your complacency on this wiki and the other. And don't talk down to me about using the sandbox considering your recent "test" edit. Lastly, now that we're talking, please learn to use the "minor edit" function properly. It's intended for making minor adjustments or fixes to the page. It's not for significant page edits like adding or removing actual article content.
  +
  +
:Now, get over yourself and put your focus on the real point of this wiki: creating a comprehensive, easy to follow guide on ''RuneScape Classic''. And make sure you do the same on the RS3 wiki.
  +
  +
:P.S. And don't think I didn't notice that you had to privately ask your buddy from RS3 wiki - who had [http://runescapeclassic.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Cook_Me_Plox otherwise] [http://runescapeclassic.wikia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=Cook+Me+Plox&page=&year=&month=-1 abandoned] this wiki - to [http://runescapeclassic.wikia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=User%3A5-x&year=2016&month=1 give you sysop here], undoubtedly to block me specifically, or protect the page, or shield the light from your abuse to people and vandalism to the wikis. [[Special:Contributions/162.72.117.100|162.72.117.100]] 06:15, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:15, 18 January 2016

Vandalism

Please do not remove content from RuneScape Classic Wiki pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 5-x Talk 10:52, January 17, 2016 (UTC)

What "vandalism" are you specifically referring to? Without reference, I'll just have to guess.
If you're referring to the fountain page, than it is you who is removing worthwhile content. Review the edits. As I've said in all those reverts to your edits, the picture you added is A.) Unnecessary, considering there is already a fountain graphic on that small page, and B.) Taken from a terrible camera angle.
As for your revert to my edit on Manual:Herblaw, my edit was to revert a previous edit which diverted it from the verbatim text. 1.) The original source really did spell it "ingrediants", which is why the {{sic}} tags are there. View the source document for yourself. link 2.) The tables are unnecessarily large and my edit does not change their presentation one bit. My edit decreased their page size, which increases loading speed. 3.) 207.255.218.229 changed the text from its verbatim text to the proper spelling. I corrected his/her mistake, and you reverted my edit. So, you vandalized the wiki. 4.) It obviously wasn't clear enough that this page was taken directly from Jagex rather than being the wiki's comprehensive guide. You did a disservice by removing my header notification. Other such notifications should be made on every article from the original Jagex Manual. 5.) You did it again by removing this picture link from the verbatim page. It may not yet be on the wiki, so you should have put it in no-wiki tags. By removing it, you diverted from the verbatim article again. 6.) I don't even know where that edit near the bottom to |daggers]] came from, considering all I did was hit Undo to his edit. If you check the source on all previous edits to that page, you'll see I made no change to it, so IDK why the wiki says it was adjusted. I talked with IP83 last February about it on the RS3 wiki and I believe it has something to do with logged out users using the source editor. Some of those random changes don't even show up in Show Changes before an edit is made. When I revert your edit, in which you incorrectly stated that the article is now a verbatim copy, the only part I won't revert is |dagger]]s near the bottom.
Or maybe you're referring to me removing the unnecessary FeaturedArticleNotice. It was over 5 years ago and that article has been adjusted significantly during that time. The notice is completely irrelevant to how the article is currently presented. And the notice itself is unnecessary anyway. It provides nothing to the actual content or the reader. If you want a list of featured articles, add it to Category:Featured articles.
I could point to you with Assume Good Faith and Don't Be A Dick, but you already know them. You're no different on this wiki than you are on the RS3 one. You're not a team player. You talk down to other editors rather than talking with them. You think your edits are superior to others just because they made them. You are prejudice to those who choose not to register accounts. You target people rather than focusing on edits to the content. For this, you could use a good kick in your complacency on this wiki and the other. And don't talk down to me about using the sandbox considering your recent "test" edit. Lastly, now that we're talking, please learn to use the "minor edit" function properly. It's intended for making minor adjustments or fixes to the page. It's not for significant page edits like adding or removing actual article content.
Now, get over yourself and put your focus on the real point of this wiki: creating a comprehensive, easy to follow guide on RuneScape Classic. And make sure you do the same on the RS3 wiki.
P.S. And don't think I didn't notice that you had to privately ask your buddy from RS3 wiki - who had otherwise abandoned this wiki - to give you sysop here, undoubtedly to block me specifically, or protect the page, or shield the light from your abuse to people and vandalism to the wikis. 162.72.117.100 06:15, January 18, 2016 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.